Hire Quality Engineers from Africa based on 30 days of real work — not interviews.
Deploy automation-proficient QA engineers directly into your sprint workflow. Evaluate real contribution in your environment over 30 days. Hire only the proven performers — risk-free for 30 days.
30-dayrisk-free evaluation
95%Placement rate
3×Faster ramp-up
UK-reg.social enterprise
LIVE
Sprint 78
Aisha K.
Quality Engineer · Lagos
PlaywrightGitHub ActionsAPI Testing
Deployed March 16th 2026
Week 3 of 4
CONVERSION RECOMMENDATION
STRONG YES
Based on production-facing QA contribution across the last 3 sprints
+9%▲
Critical coverage added 64% → 82%
10
High-severity bugs Caught pre-release
2
Escaped defects (both minor)
24
QA contributions PRs + test scripts
Autonomy score:3.8/5 ▲ +0.5
Flaky test rate:4% ▼ vs cohort avg 7%
Bug reopen rate:6%
Documentation:Strong
CI integration:Stable
"One of the strongest engineers we've evaluated. Caught a race condition most juniors missed."
— Sarah T., Engineering Manager
View Full Evaluation →
×
Aisha K. — 30-Day Evaluation Snapshot
Quality Engineer · Lagos · Week 3 of 4
✓ Strong progression recommendation
Performance evidence
Area
Result
What it shows
Coverage growth
+9%
73% → 82% across priority regression flows
High-severity bugs caught
10
Including a race condition and other pre-release issues
Escaped defects
2 (both minor)
Visual regressions only; root causes documented and follow-up coverage added
QA contributions delivered
24
Tests, bug reports, and workflow improvements across active sprint work
Autonomy score
3.8/5 ▲ +0.5
Still needs occasional support on unfamiliar edge cases, but improving steadily
Flaky test rate
4%
Below cohort average of 7%
Bug reopen rate
6%
Below programme target of 10%
Documentation quality
Strong
Reports are clear, reproducible, and well-structured
CI integration
Stable
Can work within CI and troubleshoot basic QA-related failures with limited support
Decision summary
Current recommendation
Strong progression
Current stage
Week 3 of 4
Next step
Apprenticeship track
Confidence
High
✅ Why this matters: This recommendation is based on observed contribution inside a real engineering environment — sprint output, QA reliability, and delivery quality, not interview performance alone.
"One of the strongest engineers we've evaluated. Caught a race condition most juniors missed."
— Sarah T., Engineering Manager
Week-by-week progression:
• Week 1: Integrated into tooling, sprint rituals, and QA workflow
• Week 2: Added useful test coverage and improved defect reporting quality
• Week 3: Caught multiple high-severity issues and earned a strong progression recommendation
Supporting artifacts typically included:
• Sprint-by-sprint progression notes
• Task delivery log
• Bug reports and evidence links
• Test outputs and workflow contributions
• Midpoint review notes
• Manager sign-off
×
Start Your 30-Day Evaluation
We'll match you with pre-vetted engineers within 48 hours.
×
✓
You're all set!
We'll match you with pre-vetted engineers within 48 hours.